Model
Samsung DVE52M77***
Rank #150 means 149 of the 615 clothes dryer models we track cost less to run each year; the 62nd efficiency percentile means it uses less energy for its size than 62% of those models.
What does the Samsung DVE52M77*** cost to run per year?
Do the math and the Samsung DVE52M77***'s $113/yr puts it at rank #150 of 615, on the cheaper side of the class. Adjusted for size, it is more efficient than 62% of clothes dryer models we track, a solidly above-average result. Its CEF of 3.94 reflects combined energy factor, one of the class's core efficiency levers.
Immediately around it on the leaderboard, the Samsung DVE52M86*** at $113/yr runs a little cheaper and the Lg DLE7200*E at $113/yr runs a little more, a sense of how tightly models are packed at this point in the ranking. A clothes dryer typically stays in service for somewhere around 13 years; over that span, the Samsung DVE52M77***'s $113/yr adds up to roughly $1469 in electricity alone, before purchase price or repairs.
Also sold as: Lg DLE3090*.
By the numbers
The Samsung DVE52M77*** normalized against its whole class, so each figure means something.
What it costs you over time
Running cost is an every-year number, so it compounds. At $113/yr, here is what the Samsung DVE52M77*** adds up to before purchase price, water, or repairs enter the math.
Left running for a decade at today's US average rate, the Samsung DVE52M77*** costs about $1130. That is roughly $0 less than the class median, which would run closer to $1130 over the same ten years.
How the Samsung DVE52M77*** compares
The clothes dryer class we track runs from $23 to $128 a year. At $113/yr, it sits right on the class median of $113, and it is about $90 a year more than the cheapest clothes dryer to run at $23.
What drives its running cost
At 7.4 cu ft, the Samsung DVE52M77*** is a small clothes dryer for its class, which spans 3.8 to 9.2 cu ft with a median of 7.4 cu ft, and smaller clothes dryer models generally cost less to run for the same job, all else being equal. Its CEF of 3.94, above the class median of 3.93, reflects combined energy factor: a higher figure means it wrings more useful work out of every kilowatt-hour, so it is the efficiency lever to weigh against raw size.
- Heat source and Combined Energy Factor (CEF). CEF combines drying performance with standby and off-mode energy use; for a given drum size, a higher CEF means less energy per pound of laundry dried, and heat-pump models usually post the highest figures in the class.
- Drum capacity. Drum capacity sets how much laundry one cycle can hold, and heating a bigger volume of air generally costs more energy per cycle.
Common questions
Is the Samsung DVE52M77*** cheap to run?
Yes, relatively. At $113 a year it ranks #150 of 615 clothes dryer models we track, in the cheaper part of its class to run.
How much does the Samsung DVE52M77*** cost per month?
Roughly $9.39/mo, spreading the $113/yr estimate evenly across twelve months at $0.1856/kWh. Actual monthly bills swing with your rate and usage pattern.
How is this running-cost figure calculated?
We take the model's published annual energy use of 607 kWh from ENERGY STAR and multiply it by the US average residential electricity rate of $0.1856/kWh, giving about $113 a year. It is an electricity-only estimate and does not include purchase price, water, or installation.
How efficient is the Samsung DVE52M77*** for its size?
62nd percentile once size is factored in, a fairly typical result for the class.
Cheaper to run in the same class
| Rank | Model | Cost/yr |
|---|---|---|
| 135 | Samsung DVE52M86***7.4 cu ft | $113 |
| 134 | Samsung DVE54M87***7.4 cu ft | $113 |
| 133 | Samsung DVE55M96***7.5 cu ft | $113 |
| 132 | Samsung DVE60M99***7.5 cu ft | $113 |
| 131 | Samsung DVE45M55***7.5 cu ft | $113 |
Source
ES_1023593_DVE52M77***_02032017114750_70117710View certified clothes dryer listingsENERGY STAR data as of July 2026Samsung and DVE52M77*** are used here for identification only and are not endorsements. Figures are computed by WattWise Labs from public ENERGY STAR data, not measured in our own lab.