Model
Mora RT210N3A*EM
Rank #734 means 733 of the 1,000 refrigerator models we track cost less to run each year; the 84th efficiency percentile means it uses less energy for its size than 84% of those models.
What does the Mora RT210N3A*EM cost to run per year?
Do the math and the Mora RT210N3A*EM's $89/yr puts it at rank #734 of 1,000, on the pricier side of the class. It uses 10% less energy than the U.S. federal standard model in its class, which would cost about $97/yr to run, a saving of roughly $8 a year. Normalized for capacity, it ranks ahead of 84% of refrigerator models we track on efficiency, a genuinely strong showing. At 21.2 cu ft, it is a large refrigerator for the class, which runs 1.2 to 31.7 cu ft; size and efficiency are the two levers behind the figure above, and this dataset does not carry a separate efficiency-factor column for this class.
Immediately around it on the leaderboard, the Stovv F20HF01SW at $88/yr runs a little cheaper and the Equator RFI 1200 S at $89/yr runs a little more, a sense of how tightly models are packed at this point in the ranking. A refrigerator typically stays in service for somewhere around 12 years; over that span, the Mora RT210N3A*EM's $89/yr adds up to roughly $1068 in electricity alone, before purchase price or repairs.
By the numbers
The Mora RT210N3A*EM normalized against its whole class, so each figure means something.
What it costs you over time
Running cost is an every-year number, so it compounds. At $89/yr, here is what the Mora RT210N3A*EM adds up to before purchase price, water, or repairs enter the math.
Left running for a decade at today's US average rate, the Mora RT210N3A*EM costs about $890. That is roughly $80 less than a standard model in its class, which would run closer to $970 over the same ten years.
How the Mora RT210N3A*EM compares
The refrigerator class we track runs from $8 to $149 a year. At $89/yr, it runs about $25 a year above the class median of $64, and it is about $81 a year more than the cheapest refrigerator to run at $8. Against the US federal standard model for its class at about $97/yr, the Mora RT210N3A*EM uses 10% less energy.
What drives its running cost
At 21.2 cu ft, the Mora RT210N3A*EM is a large refrigerator for its class, which spans 1.2 to 31.7 cu ft with a median of 12.6 cu ft, among refrigerator models, bigger capacity is the most common reason a running-cost figure lands on the high side, all else being equal.
- Interior volume. Cubic feet of interior volume is the first thing that scales a fridge's running cost up or down, before compressor quality even enters the picture.
- Counter depth vs standard depth. Counter-depth models sit flush with cabinets but usually hold less interior volume than a standard-depth model of the same width, which can nudge the per-cubic-foot running cost either way.
- Compressor technology. Newer variable-speed (inverter) compressors modulate output instead of cycling fully on and off, which tends to use less energy for the same cooling job than an older fixed-speed compressor.
- Placement and ventilation. A fridge pushed tight against a wall or cabinet, or standing next to an oven or in direct sun, works harder to shed the heat its compressor produces, which can push real-world cost above the published figure.
Common questions
Is the Mora RT210N3A*EM cheap to run?
Not especially. At $89 a year it ranks #734 of 1,000 refrigerator models we track, in the pricier part of its class to run, though its size and features may still justify that for your needs.
How much does the Mora RT210N3A*EM cost per month?
Roughly $7.39/mo, spreading the $89/yr estimate evenly across twelve months at $0.1856/kWh. Actual monthly bills swing with your rate and usage pattern.
How is this running-cost figure calculated?
We take the model's published annual energy use of 478 kWh from ENERGY STAR and multiply it by the US average residential electricity rate of $0.1856/kWh, giving about $89 a year. It is an electricity-only estimate and does not include purchase price, water, or installation.
How efficient is the Mora RT210N3A*EM for its size?
84th percentile once size is factored in. That means its size-adjusted efficiency is a real factor in the running-cost figure above; its capacity plays a large role too.
Cheaper to run in the same class
| Rank | Model | Cost/yr |
|---|---|---|
| 733 | Stovv F20HF01SW19.7 cu ft | $88 |
| 732 | Black Decker BR2010JIMW20.1 cu ft | $88 |
| 731 | Beko BBBF3019WE16.4 cu ft | $88 |
| 730 | Marvel MPRI*24-SS*1A4.9 cu ft | $87 |
| 729 | Bosch B30IB905SP16 cu ft | $87 |
Source
ES_1110877_RT210N3A*EM_030520260120877_1308774View certified refrigerator listingsENERGY STAR data as of July 2026Mora and RT210N3A*EM are used here for identification only and are not endorsements. Figures are computed by WattWise Labs from public ENERGY STAR data, not measured in our own lab.